What is the problem this feature would solve?
Effect.provide can take an array, so using Layer.mergeAll is redundant (when not doing further transformations).
What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
Effect.provide(Layer.mergeAll(foo, bar)) becomes Effect.provide([foo, bar]).
Effect.provide(Layer.mergeAll(foo, bar).pipe(Layer.provide(baz)) is left untouched.
What alternatives have you considered?
No response
What is the problem this feature would solve?
Effect.providecan take an array, so usingLayer.mergeAllis redundant (when not doing further transformations).What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
Effect.provide(Layer.mergeAll(foo, bar))becomesEffect.provide([foo, bar]).Effect.provide(Layer.mergeAll(foo, bar).pipe(Layer.provide(baz))is left untouched.What alternatives have you considered?
No response