dotcraft项目的未来的规划和当前专注的解决的问题是什么？

[js0007]

dotcraft是.NET Agent开源项目中最卓越的项目之一，钦佩作者的代码质量和优雅的设计，项目架构让人惊艳。我关注并跟进项目很久了，自己的项目也借鉴了不少作者的设计和实现。谢谢~
想请教作者：
0、目前dotcraft你关注解决哪方面的问题，同时未来的规划和发展方向是什么？
1、Codex 和 WorkBuddy的Cowork路线吗？
2、会推出智能体面板吗？

[AkiKurisu]

Ref #64

[AkiKurisu]

感谢您的关注。dotcraft 依然是我的业余爱好项目，虽然它确实被用在了我的“主业”上。
目前我对 dotcraft 的理解是它是定制化 AI Engineering 的基础设施。就像目前有大量的企业在做垂类 Agent 应用一样，一个通用 agent harness是必不可少的。
企业使用开源的 agent harness 有不少好处，除了接入内部 OAuth 服务，内部 Skill/Plugin Hub 外，它更稳定、更具拓展性。
这引申出我对您 questions[0] 的解释，dotcraft 会更看重拓展性。dotcraft 已经做了包括 appbinding、agent profiles、mcpapps、sdk 等面向开发者的拓展基建。https://github.com/DotHarness/oratorio 就是利用这些基建的示例项目之一，它目前被用到了组织公开仓库和我个人项目的PR Review 工作流中。

对于 questions[1]，我个人认为 Cowork 暂时不会碰，对于开源项目来说做这个不合适。Cowork 是 Coding Agent 的一层商业封装，它重点是怎么提供更多符合用户习惯的工作方式，例如 Microsoft Office 全家桶、google 生态。因此它竞争的是生态，这块 Codex（ChatGPT） 的 App Connector 应该是更胜一筹的。
另一方面， Coding Agent GUI 我认为是依然适合做的，因为它是验证 dotcraft 工作能力和建立信任的一个方式。

对于 question[2]，我不太理解这个智能体面板是什么意思，如果是指多智能体协作，我认为 dotcraft 已经提供了 thread 管理工具（允许agent创建 thread）、subagents 功能（允许多 agent 并行工作）和 agent teams（一个更实验性的编排功能）。我目前正在探索企业级的 Agent 平台方案，可能一定程度上会符合你说的智能体面板，不过这是之后的事情，敬请期待~

[AkiKurisu]

Thank you for your attention. Dotcraft remains my hobby project, although it is indeed used in my "main job."

My current understanding of Dotcraft is that it is the infrastructure for customized AI engineering. Just as many companies are currently developing vertical agent applications, a general agent harness is essential.

There are many benefits for companies using open-source agent harnesses. In addition to accessing internal OAuth services and internal Skill/Plugin Hubs, it is more stable and more scalable.

This leads to my explanation of your questions[0]: Dotcraft places more emphasis on scalability. Dotcraft has already developed developer-oriented infrastructure including appbinding, agent profiles, mcpapps, and SDKs. https://github.com/DotHarness/oratorio is one example project that utilizes these infrastructures, and it is currently used in the PR review workflow of the organization's public repositories and my personal projects.

Regarding questions[1], I personally think that Cowork will not touch it for the time being, as it is not suitable for open-source projects. Cowork is a commercial wrapper around Coding Agent, focusing on providing more user-friendly workflows, such as the Microsoft Office suite and the Google ecosystem. Therefore, it competes in the ecosystem, and Codex (ChatGPT)'s App Connector is likely superior in this area.

On the other hand, I believe a Coding Agent GUI is still suitable, as it's a way to verify dotcraft's capabilities and build trust.

Regarding question [2], I don't quite understand what this agent panel means. If it refers to multi-agent collaboration, I think dotcraft already provides thread management tools (allowing agents to create threads), subagents functionality (allowing multiple agents to work in parallel), and agent teams (a more experimental orchestration feature). I'm currently exploring enterprise-level agent platform solutions, which might somewhat match the agent panel you mentioned, but that's a matter for later. Stay tuned!