Skip to content

feedback: what do you think of the TreeDiff file format? #7

@monperrus

Description

@monperrus

Hi,

We're working a common file format for the output of tree differencing tools. The idea is that many tree differencing tools would have an option to output this format. This would:

  • ease building tools on top of tree differencing
  • ease scientific experiments to compare the effectiveness of each tool on specific use cases.

Here is a first draft of the TreeDiff file format: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15ITrZ4c0qdb4rGLfaMt8K9VPG1CkNp5QSgfOY6jzpEk/edit?usp=sharing (comments can be left in the Gdoc))

What do you think?

Best regards,

Jean-Rémy (@jrfaller), Matias (@martinezmatias) and Martin (@monperrus) (authors of Gumtree

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions